MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017240078 · doi:10.1080/10406630108233818

Reactions of Methylated Naphthalenes with Hydroxyl Radicals Under Simulated Atmospheric Conditions

2001· article· en· W2017240078 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia E. Banceu, Cristian Mihele, Douglas A. Lane, Nigel J. Bunce

Bibliographic record

VenuePolycyclic aromatic compounds · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRadicalHydroxyl radicalPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gas-phase reactions of OH with 1- and 2-methylnaphthalene, 1,3- and 2,3-dimethylnaphthalene, acenaphthylene and acenaphthene were investigated under simulated atmospheric conditions in a 10m3 smog chamber. The rates of reaction, relative to naphthalene = 1.0, were 1-methylnaphthalene, 1.5; 2-methylnaphthalene, 2.1; 1,3-dimethylnaphthalene, 0.9; 2,3-dimethylnaphthalene, 0.9; acenaphthene, 2.9; and acenaphthylene, 5.8. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used to analyze the organic reaction products, thus avoiding the production of artifacts observed in the previously used cold finger trapping procedure. Reaction products were mainly homologs of those formed in the reaction of naphthalene with OH radicals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolycyclic aromatic compoundsSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207