Aboriginal and Indigenous People's Resistance, the Internet, and Education
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines exchanges in an Internet newsgroup which is focused on issues pertaining to Aboriginal peoples. The examination of these exchanges highlights cyberspace as sites where colonial misunderstandings are evident and resistance to these dominant discourses is possible. Issues of pedagogy and Aboriginal peoples on the Internet are explored. Given that home and school use of the Internet is ever increasing, it is of growing importance for educators and academics to consider ways that cultural groups are represented in this context. Internet texts, just as texts, books, and media before them, produce cultural narratives in regard to Aboriginal peoples. How are cultures represented? Who controls these representations? This article provides examples of resistance to colonial discourses about Aboriginal peoples but cautions that there are risks with the increasing commercialisation of the Internet that dominant discourses might prevail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it