Utilisation de vecteurs tournants pour l'optimisation de la formulation de mélanges de solvants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new strategy is proposed to optimize the design of solvent blends without using complex mathematical models and (or) graphical representations. All calculations are made with standard electronic programs, such as Excel, Lotus, etc. This approach was developed for the cleaning and degreasing industry, which has to find new recipes of solvent blends on a regular basis. The process relies on a visual analysis of the sum of normalized rotating vectors associated with the chemical composition and the physical properties of the individual components. This approach allows for representation of all parameters on a two-dimensional plot, including information about chemical composition, as well as the physical properties to be optimized. The research of a new mixture of halogenated solvents will be used as an example to illustrate the various steps of this technique. This method is not limited to solvent applications; it also applies to all problems that involve comparisons of physical and chemical properties of blends.Key words: solvents, mixtures, components, optimization, cleaning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it