<i>AB INITIO</i> CALCULATIONS OF STRUCTURAL AND ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES OF THE COMPOUND <font>Li</font><sub>3</sub><font>AlB</font><sub>2</sub><font>O</font><sub>6</sub>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The two equilibrium structures of the compound Li 3 AlB 2 O 6 have been investigated via the minimization of the total energy within Local Spin Density Approximation (LSDA) based on the Density Functional Theory (DFT) in our work. The calculated lattice parameters are all in good agreement with their corresponding experimental values. The relative stability of the two structures are determined. We find that the structure suggested by He et al. is more stable than that proposed by Abdullaev et al. at zero pressure conditions. The reasons for which the structure suggested by He et al. is more stable are also described. Then the electronic properties of the compound Li 3 AlB 2 O 6 including the density of states and energy band structure are successfully obtained and compared for the two structures. We find that the properties of insulator decreases from the structure suggested by He et al. to the structure proposed by Abdullaev et al.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it