Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the key institutional aspects of both the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and the Office of the Registrar. The mandate of the SCC is to have and to exercise a general appellate jurisdiction in all areas of law, within and throughout Canada. The Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (the Office) provides the full range of services and administrative support which the Court needs in order to hear cases and to render decisions. It also serves as the interface between the litigants and the Court. The SCC operates under the parameters described in the Supreme Court Act. The Act specifies, among other things, the number of judges on the Court (nine); the fact that there must at all times be at least three judges from the province of Quebec; the minimum qualifications for appointees and the means of their appointment. After describing the setup and function of the Office, this article describes some of the continuing challenges, including: Maintaining Judicial and Institutional Independence; Compliance with Central Agency Requirements and Policies; and recruitment and retention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.034 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.028 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".