Membrane inflation of polymeric materials: Experiments and finite element simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A high‐speed optical measurement system, which is capable of measuring transient surface shape, is used in the polymer membrane inflation experiments. The accurate measurement data, which is an array of points, with known Cartesian coordinates and with respect to a fixed coordinate system, provides a source for further bubble shape analysis. Inflation pressure is correlated with each bubble shape measurement. The measured results reveal the importance of the thermal warpage and temperature gradient in the bubble inflation tests. Potential errors in the material parameter calculation, which are caused by assuming uniform temperature and zero thermal warpage, are pointed out. Consequently, a finite element analysis has been carried out to simulate the membrane inflation with/without thermal warpage and the temperature gradient. The material parameters obtained considering the thermal warpage and temperature gradient yield improved agreement with the experimental data. Although in this paper the measurement data is mainly used for the determination of the material parameters in the bubble inflation tests, they are also a source of validating other computer‐aided simulations as well as in the study of the thermal shrinkage of polymer products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it