MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2017328258 · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2010.5594546

Balance the Trade-Off between the Accessibility and Performance of Distributed Routing Schemes in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks

2010· article· en· W2017328258 on OpenAlexafffund
Weiwei Wang, Jun Cai, Attahiru Sule Alfa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceHop (telecommunications)Computer networkGeographic routingWirelessRouting (electronic design automation)Routing protocolDynamic Source RoutingDistributed computingStatic routingWireless networkEnergy consumptionTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a general framework, called probability-based solution (PBS), is proposed to balance the trade-off between the accessibility (in terms of the success probability to find a route reaching the destination) and the performance (in terms of spectral efficiency, outage probability or energy consumption) of distributed routing schemes in multi-hop wireless networks. In the PBS, the candidate nodes (receivers) in each hop are first separated into two groups based on a direction either diverging from, or converging to, the direct line between the source and destination. Then, one of the best nodes from the two groups is selected according to a carefully-defined probability by considering the uncertainty in the subsequent hops. The simulation results demonstrate that integrating the proposed PBS with conventional distributed routing schemes can significantly improve the accessibility and effectively guarantee other system performance. Moreover, the PBS can also be combined with facing routing to solve the connectivity hole problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→