MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017330732 · doi:10.3138/utq.69.2.529

Aristotle's Four Aims for Dramatic Character and His Method in the <i>Poetics</i>

2000· article· en· W2017330732 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hollis Rinehart

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsCharacter (mathematics)LiteraturePhilosophyFifteenthInterpretation (philosophy)EpistemologyLinguisticsHistoryArtPoetryClassicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every translation is of course at the same time an interpretation; the extent to which this is true of Aristotle's Poetics, however, needs to be experienced to be appreciated. The fifteenth chapter of the Poetics furnishes an excellent example. In it Aristotle sets forth four goals the playwright should aim at in constructing his characters. The third of these is variously translated by Bywater as 'the third is to make them like the reality,' by Grube as 'the third aim is to be true to life,' and by Else (Poetics) as 'the third is likeness to human nature in general.' There are some interesting similarities and differences between these three translations, but all have one thing in common: none is justified by the text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207