MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017330732 · doi:10.3138/utq.69.2.529

Aristotle's Four Aims for Dramatic Character and His Method in the <i>Poetics</i>

2000· article· en· W2017330732 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hollis Rinehart

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsCharacter (mathematics)LiteraturePhilosophyFifteenthInterpretation (philosophy)EpistemologyLinguisticsHistoryArtPoetryClassicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every translation is of course at the same time an interpretation; the extent to which this is true of Aristotle's Poetics, however, needs to be experienced to be appreciated. The fifteenth chapter of the Poetics furnishes an excellent example. In it Aristotle sets forth four goals the playwright should aim at in constructing his characters. The third of these is variously translated by Bywater as 'the third is to make them like the reality,' by Grube as 'the third aim is to be true to life,' and by Else (Poetics) as 'the third is likeness to human nature in general.' There are some interesting similarities and differences between these three translations, but all have one thing in common: none is justified by the text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.027
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207