MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017393167 · doi:10.3166/acsm.32.487-504

Adsorption des métaux lourds contenus dans l'acide phosphorique industriel par une bentonite algérienne activée. modélisation

2007· article· fr· W2017393167 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Mellah, Djafar Benachour

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBentoniteChemistryNuclear chemistryGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le present travail, nous nous interessons a la caracterisation physico-chimique de l'acide phosphorique pretraite produit a l'unite des engrais phosphates d'Annaba (Est-Algerie) et a l'activation de la bentonite brute, utilisee pour l'elimination des metaux lourds contenus dans l'acide phosphorique pretraite. Le pretraitement de l'acide phosphorique industriel est realise au moyen de charbon actif pour eliminer les matieres organiques dissoutes successibles de gener la recuperation des metaux lourds. L'activation de la bentonite est effectuee par voie chimique, en utilisant l'acide sulfurique H 2 SO 4 . Deux parametres importants ont ete examines, la concentration de l'acide et la temperature. Des tests d'adsorption de zinc (II), de cadmium (II) et de chrome (III), contenus dans H 3 PO 4 5,5 M pretraite (30% P 2 O s ), ont ete realises dans differentes conditions de temperature, de pH et de quantites de bentonite, dans le but de developper un procede de fixation a l'echelle du laboratoire. Une modelisation du procede a ete egalement realisee. L'application du modele, defini dans le domaine experimental 1,25≤pH ≤2,50; 0,50g≤ masse de bentonite ≤2,5 g; 20°C ≤ T ≤ 70°C, a permis de donner un rendement moyen de 88 % pour l'adsorption du zinc (II) et 89 % pour le cadmium (II) et le chrome (III).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicPhosphorus and nutrient managementFrench-language works237,207