MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017438457 · doi:10.1109/51.827404

Naso-occipital vestibulo-ocular reflex responses in normal subjects

2000· article· en· W2017438457 on OpenAlexaff
R. D. Tomlinson, Raymond Tak Fai Cheung, Alan Blakeman

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVergence (optics)Eye movementReflexVestibulo–ocular reflexNeurosciencePsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The naso-occipital translational vestibulo-ocular reflex provides a particularly difficult problem for the brain's control system, as the movements of the two eyes are disjunctive and are often even in different directions. Consequently, when the target is located on the midline and the required eye movements are similar to vergence movements, the reflex might be driven using vergence pathways. Alternatively, the ascending tract of Deiters might be used to generate these required disjunctive movements. Since the vergence system is known to have rather sluggish dynamics, it might be possible to distinguish between these two hypotheses based on the dynamics of the movements. This article presents experiments that were undertaken in order to shed more light on these questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology MagazineSame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207