MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017438765 · doi:10.1109/rws.2010.5434257

A frequency multiplication based LO phase shifting technique for phased-array architectures

2010· article· en· W2017438765 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser Soliman, R. Mason

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase shift modulePhased arrayAmplifierComparatorCMOSCalibrationPhase (matter)Electrical engineeringMultiplication (music)Phased-array opticsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsInsertion lossVoltageAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A frequency multiplication based LO phase shifting technique is presented for use in phased-array front end architectures operating in the ISM band at 24 GHz. The presented architecture employs a two-stage phase shifter, a high-speed comparator and a Q-enhanced tuned amplifier to synthesize 18 GHz tones from a 2GHz reference. The synthesized tones are used to injection lock 18 GHz LC-oscillators in close proximity to the RF/mm-w front-ends in a phased-array system. A digital means for phase shift calibration is discussed. Implemented in IBM's 120 nm CMOS technology, the proposed architecture consumes 14.2 mW from a 1.2 V supply. The oscillator core consumes 3.7 mW. The maximum phase shift errors at 18GHz is 5° and 0.79° before and after calibration, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207