MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017442846 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2014.2326054

A Novel Modeling Approach for System-Level Application Mapping Targeted for Configurable Architecture

2014· article· en· W2017442846 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hossein Sabaghian-Bidgoli, Seyed Ali Shahabi, Zainalabedin Navabi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystemCComputer scienceExecutableDesign space explorationArchitectureComputer architecturePetri netEmbedded systemComputer engineeringDistributed computingProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in chip fabrication technology and increasing demand for meeting time to market have led to the use of the electronic system-level (ESL) design methodology. An important challenge is to find a proper approach by which a given application can be mapped into a specific target architecture, usually called application mapping. In this paper, an abstract modeling approach based on the colored Petri net (CPN) is proposed to map an arbitrary application into a given target architecture. The mapping is at an abstract level and contains timing information that facilitates high-level design space exploration. A complete stepwise procedure is presented to illustrate how a CPN model of the application is refined and employed to extract the required tasks for a given target architecture. The fact that models obtained as such are executable makes the required performance evaluation and exploration possible, and thus, will result in better architectural decisions at the design stage. The usefulness of the proposed approach is assessed using several alternative mapping schemes of the JPEG encoder. The actual encoding time and the required simulation time indicate the advantages of this method over design-space exploration that would otherwise be done in SystemC, which is the natural choice in today's ESL designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207