A Density Functional Theory Investigation on the Mechanism of the Second Half-Reaction of Nitric Oxide Synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Density functional theory methods have been employed to systematically investigate the overall mechanism of the second half-reaction of nitric oxide synthases. The initial heme-bound hydrogen peroxide intermediate previously identified is found to first undergo a simple rotation about its O-O peroxide bond. Then, via a "ping-pong" peroxidase-like mechanism the -O(in)H- proton is transferred back onto the substrate's -NO oxygen then subsequently onto the outer oxygen of the resulting Fe(heme)-OOH species. As a result, O(out) is released as H2O with concomitant formation of a compound I-type (Fe(heme)-O) species. Formation of the final citrulline and NO products can then be achieved in one step via a tetrahedral transition structure resulting from direct attack of the Fe(heme)-O moiety at the substrate's guanidinium carbon center. The possible role of alternative mechanisms involving a protonated compound II-type species or an initial transfer of only the -NH- hydrogen of the =NHOH+ group of N(omega)-hydroxy-L-arginine is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".