MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017465731 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11228

A generalized class of skew distributions and associated robust quantile regression models

2014· article· en· W2017465731 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nuttanan Wichitaksorn, S. T. Boris Choy, Richard Gerlach

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkewnessMathematicsStatisticsQuantile regressionSkewUnivariateEconometricsParametric statisticsQuantileMarkov chain Monte CarloSkew normal distributionRegression analysisMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceMultivariate statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article proposes a generalized class of univariate skew distributions that are constructed through partitioning two scaled mixture of normal (Gaussian) distributions. The proposed distributions have a skewness parameter defined in the interval (0,1), allowing direct application to parametric quantile regression. Employing scale mixture of normals facilitates efficient estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Two simulation studies, one on estimation with skew error regression models, the other on parametric quantile regression models reveal favourable estimation properties. Two corresponding empirical studies, one analysing U.S. market returns, the other on infant birthweight data further illustrate the proposed distributions and their estimation.The Canadian Journal of Statistics42: 579–596; 2014 © 2014 Statistical Society of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207