MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017497097 · doi:10.1063/1.373671

Theory of longitudinal magnetoimpedance in wires

2000· article· en· W2017497097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGiant magnetoimpedanceCondensed matter physicsAnisotropyMagnetic fieldMaterials scienceGiant magnetoresistancePhysicsMagnetoresistanceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theory of giant magnetoimpedance (GMI) in anisotropic magnetic wires is presented. The theory is valid over a broad field and frequency range. The emphasis is put on the GMI response in the low field region, where the wire is not saturated. The behavior of the wire may be described using three magnetic modes of mixed electromagnetic and spin wave character and one nonmagnetic mode, which is uncoupled from the magnetic response of the material. The properties of these four modes are discussed, with particular attention to the exchange-conductivity effects, which play a decisive role at moderate frequency. Application of the theory to real material is examined, with an outline of its applicability and its limitations. Predictions of the model compare well with experimental data on CoFeSiB wire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it