MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017537874 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2007.4449127

The Towed Torpedo Emulator (TOTEM) System

2007· article· en· W2017537874 on OpenAlexaff
Mark V. Trevorrow, Richard A. G. Fleming

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWinchTowingMarine engineeringProjectorPropellerAcousticsSonarUnderwaterEngineeringSea trialComputer scienceGeologyMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a new towed underwater acoustic projector system designed to exercise Naval surface ship torpedo detection systems. The TOTEM system is built around a standard 7-m Rigid-Hulled Inflatable Boat (RHIB), with capability for towing the acoustic projector towfish at depths up to 40 m and speeds up to 20 knots. The RHIB was modified with a more powerful (260 HP) engine, a twin-counter-rotating propeller drive, a hydraulic winch, and deployment/recovery A- frame. The acoustic projector systems were designed to broadcast torpedo-like signatures, contained in standard WAV files, over the frequency band 100 Hz to 10 kHz, with an additional 20- 32 kHz pinger emulating a torpedo sonar. An overview of the system design and results from recent sea-trials and acoustic calibrations will be given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207