MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017538648 · doi:10.1115/1.2957914

Dense Particulate Flow in a Cold Gas Dynamic Spray System

2008· article· en· W2017538648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsMechanicsParticle (ecology)Materials scienceParticle velocityShock waveGas dynamic cold sprayShock (circulatory)NozzleStokes numberVolume fractionDeposition (geology)Particle sizeTurbulenceThermodynamicsChemistryComposite materialPhysicsGeologyReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of particle-gas and particle-particle interactions in a cold spray process is studied when the particle loading is high. To examine the effect of the presence of a dense particulate flow on the supersonic gas, an Eulerian-Eulerian approach is used. It is found that when the volume fraction of the injected particles is increased, the turbulence of the gas phase will be augmented by the motion of particles and consequently, the shape, the strength, and the location of the compression and expansion waves will be altered. Shock-particle interactions are demonstrated for various volume fractions. Another important parameter, which will affect the spraying deposition efficiency, is the substrate stand-off distance. It is found that the stagnation pressure alternates for different stand-off distances because of the formation of compression and expansion waves outside the nozzle exit. The particle normal velocity on impact is a strong function of the stagnation pressure on the substrate as particles must pierce through the bow shock formed on that region. The effect of the particle size and number density are also studied for different loading conditions. It is found that small and large particles behave differently as they pass through shock diamonds and the bow shock, i.e., in the case of very small particles, as the loading increases, the impact velocity increases, while, for the large particles, the trend is reversed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it