MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association of SPARC (osteonectin, BM-40) with extracellular and intracellular components of the ciliated surface ectoderm ofXenopus embryos

2000· article· en· W2017570951 on OpenAlexaff
My‐Hang Huynh, Henry Hong, Shayna Delovitch, Sherwin S. Desser, Maurice Ringuette

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
KeywordsCell biologyBiologyOsteonectinEctodermCiliumCiliogenesisImmunostainingMesodermEpidermis (zoology)MicrotubuleAdherens junctionAnatomyEmbryonic stem cellCellEmbryogenesisEmbryoCadherinImmunologyImmunohistochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SPARC (Secreted Protein, Acidic, Rich in Cysteine) was detected by immunohistochemistry in the sensorial layer of the bilayered embryonic epidermis of Xenopus laevis during neurulation, when a subset of the sensorial cells are selected to differentiate into ciliated cell precursors. After the ciliated cells had intercalated into the outer layer and had undergone ciliogenesis, intense SPARC immunostaining was associated with the cilia and remained associated with the cilia throughout their persistence on the epidermis. Circumferential SPARC immunostaining was also detected at the interface between surface epithelial cells. Animal cap explants indicated that the embryonic activation of SPARC expression in the dorsal ectoderm does not require signaling from factors secreted by the underlying mesoderm. Immunoelectron microscopy revealed that SPARC is intimately associated with the 9 + 2 microtubule arrays of cilia. Our data indicate that SPARC plays a role in the development and function of the surface ciliated epidermis of Xenopus embryos. We propose that the counter-adhesive activity of SPARC facilitates the intercalation of ciliary cell precursors to the surface epithelial layer, where its Ca(2+)-binding abilities promote cell-cell adhesion. Based on its association with ciliary microtubule arrays, we also propose that intracellular SPARC may play a role in regulating ciliary beat frequency and polarity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Motility and the CytoskeletonSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207