MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017580740 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.620

Simulation of CO2-Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) using Neural Networks

2013· article· en· W2017580740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMiscibilityEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringArtificial neural networkProcess (computing)EngineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CO2-oil minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) is a key parameter in CO2 enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) process. This work developed a fast and vigorous mathematical method using artificial neural network (ANN) model based on genetic algorithm to predict the CO2-oil MMP which was affected by several factors (i.e. reservoir temperature, the composition of reservoir oil, and the composition of injected gas). The study evaluated the performance of the newly developed ANN-based model by the errors between the predicted values and the target values. It was found that the developed ANN model provided a reliable theoretical basis for CO2 flooding, as well as offered a guidance to the successful implementation of CO2-EOR process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it