MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017580740 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.620

Simulation of CO2-Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) using Neural Networks

2013· article· en· W2017580740 on OpenAlexaff
Guang‐Ying Chen, Xiangzeng Wang, Zhiwu Liang, Ruimin Gao, Teerawat Sema, Peng Luo, Fanhua Zeng, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMiscibilityEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringArtificial neural networkProcess (computing)EngineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CO2-oil minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) is a key parameter in CO2 enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) process. This work developed a fast and vigorous mathematical method using artificial neural network (ANN) model based on genetic algorithm to predict the CO2-oil MMP which was affected by several factors (i.e. reservoir temperature, the composition of reservoir oil, and the composition of injected gas). The study evaluated the performance of the newly developed ANN-based model by the errors between the predicted values and the target values. It was found that the developed ANN model provided a reliable theoretical basis for CO2 flooding, as well as offered a guidance to the successful implementation of CO2-EOR process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207