MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predictive ability of sequential surveys in determining donor loss from increasingly stringent variant Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease deferral policies

2006· article· en· W2017592562 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sheila F. O’Brien, Jo Anne Chiavetta, Mindy Goldman, Wenli Fan, Rama C. Nair, Graham D. Sher, Eleftherios C. Vamvakas

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeferralMedicineBlood supplyDemographyBlood collectionSurgeryEmergency medicineBusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Predonation screening questions about travel increase the safety of the blood supply from diseases such as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) and malaria. This study examines the ability of sequential surveys to predict actual travel deferrals and the operational validity of travel questions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To assess donor travel histories before implementing key deferral policies, two donor surveys were carried out at Canadian Blood Services collection sites in February 1999 (8026 donors) and March 2001 (13,623 donors). In-person interviews were carried out with 1530 donors to assess the operational validity of the short travel question. Time-series analysis was used to determine whether there was a change in deferrals when deferral policies were implemented. Predicted donor loss estimates based on survey results were compared with actual deferrals. RESULTS: Deferrals increased significantly (p < 0.05) when vCJD deferral policies were implemented in October 1999 and September 2001, but not in October 2000. Survey data accurately predicted deferrals 6 months after implementation from the initial policy (2.51% predicted vs. 2.51% actual), but there were fewer deferrals than predicted for the second (2.89% predicted vs. 2.26% actual, p < 0.01) and third deferral policies (3.10% predicted vs. 1.89% actual, p < 0.01). There was 96 percent agreement between donor responses to a short screening question and a detailed travel history. CONCLUSION: The initial survey accurately predicted the actual donor deferral rate, but the deferral rate was less than predicted for subsequent, more stringent donor deferral policies. Donors answered a short travel question suitable for donor screening similarly to a very detailed travel history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207