MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017605046 · doi:10.1115/icone18-30192

Analysis of Updated SuperCritical Water Heat Transfer Correlations for Vertical Bare Tubes

2010· article· en· W2017605046 on OpenAlex
Sarah Mokry, Sahil Gupta, Amjad Farah, Krysten King, Igor Pioro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 2 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
KeywordsSupercritical fluidCoolantHeat transferCritical heat fluxMaterials scienceThermodynamicsHeat fluxConvective heat transferMass fluxTube (container)ConvectionMechanicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In support of developing SuperCritical Water-cooled Reactors (SCWRs), studies are currently being conducted for heat-transfer at supercritical conditions. This paper presents an analysis of heat-transfer to SuperCritical Water (SCW) flowing in bare vertical tubes as a first step towards thermohydraulic calculations in a fuel-channel. A large set of experimental data, obtained in Russia, was analyzed. Two updated heat-transfer correlations for forced convective heat transfer in the normal heat transfer regime to SCW flowing in a bare vertical tube were developed. It is expected that the next generation of water-cooled nuclear reactors will operate at supercritical pressures (∼25 MPa) with high coolant temperatures (350–625°C). Currently, there are no experimental datasets for heat transfer from power reactor fuel bundles to the fuel coolant (water) available in open literature. Therefore, for preliminary calculations, heat-transfer correlations obtained with bare tube data can be used as a conservative approach. The analyzed experimental dataset was obtained for SCW flowing upward in a 4-m-long vertical bare tube. The data was collected at pressures of about 24 MPa for several combinations of wall and bulk-fluid temperatures that were below, at, or above the pseudocritical temperature. The values for mass flux ranged from 200–1500 kg/m2s, for heat flux up to 1250 kW/m2 and inlet temperatures from 320–350°C. The Mokry et al. correlation was developed as a Dittus-Boelter-type correlation, with thermophysical properties taken at bulk-fluid temperatures. Alternatively, the Gupta et al. correlation was developed based on the Swenson et al. approach, where the majority of thermophysical properties are taken at the wall temperature. An analysis of the two updated heat-transfer correlations is presented in this paper. Both correlations demonstrated a good fit (±25% for Heat Transfer Coefficient (HTC) values and ±15% for calculated wall temperatures) for the analyzed dataset. Thus, these correlations can be used for preliminary HTC calculations in SCWR fuel bundles as a conservative approach, for SCW heat exchangers, for future comparisons with other independent datasets and for the verification of computer codes for SCWR core thermohydraulics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it