MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017619742 · doi:10.1515/jgt.2010.067

Steinberg lattice of the general linear group and its modular reduction

2010· article· en· W2017619742 on OpenAlexaff
Fernando Szechtman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Group Theory · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsModular designLattice (music)Reduction (mathematics)Modular groupPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldGeometryPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let G 1⁄4 GLnðqÞ be the general linear group of degree nd 2 defined over a finite field Fq of characteristic p. We fix a prime l0 p and let R denote a local principal ideal domain having characteristic 0, maximal ideal lR, and containing a primitive p-th root of unity. Then the residue field K 1⁄4 R=lR has characteristic l and a primitive p-th root of unity. By a Steinberg lattice of G over R we understand a left RG-module, say M, which is free of rank qnðn 1Þ=2 as an R-module and a¤ords the Steinberg character. The reduction of M modulo l is the KG-module M=lM. In this paper the Steinberg lattice is the left ideal I 1⁄4 RG e of the group algebra RG,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Group TheorySame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207