MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017635465 · doi:10.1002/bit.23202

Flow dynamics within a bioreactor for tissue engineering by residence time distribution analysis combined with fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging to investigate forced permeability and apparent diffusion coefficient in a perfusion cell culture chamber

2011· article· en· W2017635465 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Dubois, Luc Tremblay, Martin Lepage, Patrick Vermette

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsHealth and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidence time distributionBioreactorPermeability (electromagnetism)ChemistryVolumetric flow rateNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyFlow (mathematics)MechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study reveals that residence time distribution (RTD) analysis with pH monitoring after acid bolus injection can be used to globally study the flow dynamics of a perfusion bioreactor, while fluorescence microscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to locally investigate mass transport within a hydrogel scaffold seeded or not with cells. The bioreactor used in this study is a close-loop tubular reactor. A dispersion model in one dimension has been used to describe the non-ideal behavior of the reactor. From open-loop experiments (single-cycle analysis), the presence of stagnant zones and back mixing were observed. The impact of the flow rate, the compliance chamber volume and mixing were investigated. Intermediate flows (30, 45, 60, and 90 mL min(-1)) had no effect over RTD function expressed in reduced time (θ). Lower flow rates (5 and 15 mL min(-1)) were associated to smaller extent of dispersion. The compliance chamber volume greatly affected the dynamics of the RTD function, while the effects of mixing and flow were small to non-significant. An empirical equation has been proposed to localize minima of the RTD function and to predict Per . Finally, cells seeded in a gelatin gel at a density of 800,000 cells mL(-1) had no effect over the permeability and the apparent diffusion coefficient, as revealed by fluorescent microscopy and MRI experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and BioengineeringSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207