MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017639777 · doi:10.3109/13697137.2013.795683

Updated 2013 International Menopause Society recommendations on menopausal hormone therapy and preventive strategies for midlife health

2013· article· en· W2017639777 on OpenAlexaff
T. J. de Villiers, Amos Pines, Nick Panay, Marco Gambacciani, David F. Archer, Rod Baber, Susan R. Davis, Anne Gompel, Victor W. Henderson, Róbert Langer, Roger A. Lobo, Geneviève Plu‐Bureau, David Sturdee

Bibliographic record

VenueClimacteric · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMenopauseHormone therapyWomen's Health InitiativeHormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)GerontologyGynecologyPostmenopausal womenFamily medicineBreast cancerInternal medicineTestosterone (patch)Cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ten years after the first results from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial were published, it seems that the atmosphere around the issue of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is increasingly ev...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0090.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations299
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClimactericSame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207