Les apports de l’organisation communautaire en CSSS aux infrastructures communautaires de développement des communautés
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les organisateurs communautaires des CLSC (OC) ont contribué au développement d’organismes communautaires qui ont maintenant les moyens de soutenir sur leurs propres bases le développement des communautés. Pour certains, la création des centres de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS) est l’occasion de s’interroger sur la pertinence de l’organisation communautaire de service public. Une recherche exploratoire menée dans trois milieux distincts montre que cette pratique demeure significativement contributive, une contribution attendue du milieu communautaire et généralement soutenue par les CSSS. La participation citoyenne et le développement des territoires posent de nouveaux défis que les OC des CSSS peuvent aider à relever en soutenant la liaison entre les CSSS et les infrastructures communautaires de développement des communautés (ICDC) et en offrant un accompagnement de milieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".