MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SOFT TISSUE DEFORMATION WITH NEURAL DYNAMICS FOR SURGERY SIMULATION

2007· article· en· W2017705302 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotropyArtificial neural networkDeformation (meteorology)Computer scienceHaptic technologyStability (learning theory)Lyapunov functionControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceClassical mechanicsPhysicsControl (management)Nonlinear systemOpticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft tissue deformation is of great importance to virtual-reality-based-surgery simulation. This paper presents a new neural-dynamics-based methodology for simulation of soft tissue deformation from the perspective of energy propagation. A novel neural network is established to propagate the energy generated by an external force among mass points of a soft tissue. The stability of the proposed neural network system is proved by using the Lyapunov stability theory. A potential-based method is presented to derive the internal forces from the natural energy distribution established by the neural dynamics. Integration with a haptic device has been achieved for interactive deformation simulation with force feedback. The proposed methodology not only accommodates isotropic, anisotropic and inhomogeneous materials by simple modification of the control coefficients, but it also accepts large-range deformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it