MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017719334 · doi:10.1080/15325000500240870

Optimal Siting of United Power Flow Controllers

2005· article· en· W2017719334 on OpenAlexaff
Bala Venkatesh, Hoay Beng Gooi

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnified power flow controllerElectric power systemPower flowReduction (mathematics)EngineeringControl theory (sociology)Flexible AC transmission systemFuzzy logicPower (physics)Transmission systemVoltageComputer scienceControl engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Control (management)Electrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unified power flow controllers (UPFC) are versatile devices capable of altering flow of power in transmission systems. This article presents a simple model of UPFC and incorporates the same into the polar form of fast decoupled power flow (FDPF) algorithm. A fuzzy evolutionary programming method is proposed for optimal siting of UPFC devices with the objectives of minimizing the total operating costs and improving the system voltage profile. The dynamic data structure used in the proposed method also is presented. The proposed algorithm was tested on the IEEE 6-bus and 57-bus systems and on a 191-bus Indian system. Test results demonstrate that an optimal siting of UPFC devices will lead to a good reduction of operating costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Components and SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207