MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017727046 · doi:10.1029/2009eo510006

Recent Developments in Paleomagnetism and Geomagnetism: Sixth Nordic Paleomagnetic Workshop; Lule, Sweden, 15–22 September 2009

2009· article· en· W2017727046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sten‐Åke Elming, L. J. Pesonen

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleomagnetismPrecambrianPhanerozoicGeologyPeriod (music)GeographyArchaeologyPaleontologyCenozoic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sixth Nordic Paleomagnetic Workshop was held in northern Sweden. The meeting focused on discussion of recent developments in paleomagnetism/geomagnetism, covering topics including thousand‐year‐scale geomagnetic field variations, paleoclimate of the Holocene (∼10,000 years ago to the present), Phanerozoic (∼545 million years ago to the present) plate reconstructions, and Precambrian (more than ∼545 million years ago) supercontinents. The workshop series began in 1986 in Espoo, Finland, in connection with the European Geotraverse Project. Since then, workshops have occurred every 45 years: the second in Sweden (1990), the third in Norway (1994), the fourth in Denmark (1999), and the fifth in Finland (2005). A total of 23 paleomagnetists and geomagnetists representing 12 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, India, Finland, Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States) participated in the sixth workshop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207