MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017728073 · doi:10.1002/chem.200801584

Thermal Decomposition Modes for Four‐Coordinate Ruthenium Phosphonium Alkylidene Olefin Metathesis Catalysts

2008· article· en· W2017728073 on OpenAlexafffund
Erin M. Leitao, S.R. Dubberley, Warren E. Piers, Qiao Wu, Robert McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRutheniumPhosphoniumOlefin metathesisThermal decompositionDecompositionCatalysisAcyclic diene metathesisChemistryOlefin fiberMetathesisMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerizationPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The four-coordinate ruthenium phosphonium alkylidenes 1-Cy and 1-iPr, differing in the substituent on the phosphorus center, were observed to decompose thermally in the presence of 1,1-dichloroethylene to produce [H(3)CPR(3)][Cl]. The major ruthenium-containing product was a trichloro-bridged ruthenium dimer that incorporates the elements of the 1,1-dichloroethylene as a dichlorocarbene ligand and a styrenic vinyl group on the supporting NHC ligand. Spectroscopic, kinetic, and deuterium-labeling experiments probed the mechanism of this process, which involves a rate-limiting C-H activation of an NHC mesityl ortho methyl group. These studies provide insight into intrinsic decomposition processes of active Grubbs type olefin metathesis catalysts, pointing the way to new catalyst design directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207