Influences of Carbon Nanotube Networking on the Conductive, Crystallization, and Thermal Expansion Behaviors of PA610-Based Nanocomposites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrical, crystallization and thermal expansion behaviors of polyamide 610 (PA610)/multi-walled carbon nanotube (CNT) nanocomposites prepared by melt mixing were investigated. Electron microscopy (Scanning Electron Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy) revealed that a good dispersion of CNT and CNT network was obtained in the PA610 matrix. Addition of CNT to PA610 matrix led to polymer nanocomposites exhibiting higher electrical conductivity and lower thermal expansion. The network of CNT in the PA610 matrix, which can be tuned by the loading of CNT and the melt isothermal treatment, was found to play an important role in reducing thermal expansion and achieving higher conductivity. Furthermore, it was shown that significant reduction in thermal expansion in PA610/CNT nanocomposites was due to both thermally insensitive CNT and formation of CNT network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it