MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017758585 · doi:10.1142/s0217984909019120

DYNAMICAL GAPS AND QUANTUM HALL EFFECT IN GRAPHENE

2009· article· en· W2017758585 on OpenAlex
É. V. Gorbar, V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters B · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneQuasiparticleQuantum Hall effectPhysicsCondensed matter physicsFerromagnetismMagnetic fieldBand gapGround stateQuantum spin Hall effectQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the gap equation for Dirac quasiparticles in graphene in a magnetic field using a low-energy effective model with a contact interaction. It is found that the order parameters connected with the quantum Hall (QH) ferromagnetism and the magnetic catalysis scenarios necessarily coexist. The ground-state solutions of the gap equation describe all the recently discovered novel QH plateaus in graphene in strong magnetic fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it