Anaphylaxis from topical bovine thrombin (Thrombostat®) during haemodialysis and evaluation of sensitization among a dialysis population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Topical bovine thrombin (TBT) is used as a topical haemostatic agent in haemodialysis (HD) units and for surgical procedures. It has caused allergic reactions during surgical procedures, but no previous cases have been reported with dialysis usage. OBJECTIVE: A case is reported of anaphylaxis due to TBT in an HD patient. This led to a determination of whether HD patients exposed to TBT develop specific IgE and IgG antibodies to TBT and an assessment of the frequency of allergic symptoms in HD patients as compared with peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 100 HD and 52 PD patients was performed using a questionnaire to determine allergic symptoms. An ELISA assay was developed to determine TBT-specific IgE and IgG serum antibodies among HD patients. HD patients without TBT exposure and age- and gender-matched blood donors served as controls. RESULTS: Allergic symptoms temporally related to dialysis reported by a questionnaire were significantly more frequent for HD patients than for PD patients: rhinoconjuctivitis 11% vs. 2%, asthma symptoms 20% vs. 6%, urticaria 23% vs. 8% (P values <0.05). Positive TBT-specific IgE and IgG antibodies were more frequent among 65 exposed HD patients (28% for IgE and 26% for IgG) than for controls (4% and 9%), P<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate the potential for sensitization and clinical allergic responses to beef thrombin when used for haemostasis in HD and suggest that other haemostatic methods should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".