MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sequential exhaustive extraction of a Mollisol soil, and characterizations of humic components, including humin, by solid and solution state NMR

2008· article· en· W2017773631 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersIrish Research CouncilScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsHuminChemistryUreaHumic acidAqueous solutionExtraction (chemistry)SolventNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary A comprehensive sequential extraction procedure was applied to isolate soil organic components using aqueous solvents at different pH values, base plus urea (base‐urea), and finally dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) plus concentrated H 2 SO 4 (DMSO‐acid) for the humin‐enriched clay separates. The extracts from base‐urea and DMSO‐acid would be regarded as ‘humin’ in the classical definitions. The fractions isolated from aqueous base, base‐urea and DMSO‐acid were characterized by solid and solution state NMR spectroscopy. The base‐urea solvent system isolated ca. 10% (by mass) additional humic substances. The combined base‐urea and DMSO‐acid solvents isolated ca. 93% of total organic carbon from the humin‐enriched fine clay fraction (<2 μm). Characterization of the humic fractions by solid‐state NMR spectroscopy showed that oxidized char materials were concentrated in humic acids isolated at pH 7, and in the base‐urea extract. Lignin‐derived materials were in considerable abundance in the humic acids isolated at pH 12.6. Only very small amounts of char‐derived structures were contained in the fulvic acids and fulvic acids‐like material isolated from the base‐urea solvent. After extraction with base‐urea, the 0.5 m NaOH extract from the humin‐enriched clay was predominantly composed of aliphatic hydrocarbon groups, and with lesser amounts of aromatic carbon (probably including some char material), and carbohydrates and peptides. From the combination of solid and solution‐state NMR spectroscopy, it is clear that the major components of humin materials, from the DMSO‐acid solvent, after the exhaustive extraction sequence, were composed of microbial and plant derived components, mainly long‐chain aliphatic species (including fatty acids/ester, waxes, lipids and cuticular material), carbohydrate, peptides/proteins, lignin derivatives, lipoprotein and peptidoglycan (major structural components in bacteria cell walls). Black carbon or char materials were enriched in humic acids isolated at pH 7 and humic acids‐like material isolated in the base‐urea medium, indicating that urea can liberate char‐derived material hydrogen bonded or trapped within the humin matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it