Microfabricated poly(ethylene glycol) templates enable rapid screening of triculture conditions for cardiac tissue engineering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to design a simple system for cultivation of micro-scale cardiac organoids and investigate the effects of cellular composition on the organoid function. We hypothesized that cultivation of cardiomyocytes (CM) on preformed networks of fibroblasts (FB) and endothelial cells (EC) would enhance the structural and functional properties of the organoids, compared to simultaneously seeding the three cell types or cultivating enriched CM alone. Microchannels for cell seeding were created by photopolymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. In the preculture group the channels were seeded with a mixture of NIH 3T3 FB and D4T EC, following by addition of neonatal rat CM after 2 days of FB/EC preculture. The control microchannels were seeded simultaneously with FB/EC/CM (simultaneous triculture) or with enriched CM alone (enriched CM). Preculture resulted in cylindrical, contractile, and compact cardiac organoids that contained elongated CM expressing connexin-43 and cardiac troponin I. In contrast, simultaneous triculture resulted in noncontractile organoids with clusters of CM growing separately from elongated FBs and ECs. The staining for Connexin-43 was absent in the simultaneous triculture group. When fixed or frozen FB/EC were utilized as a preculture substrate for CM, noncontractile organoids were obtained; while preculture on a single cell type (either FB or EC) resulted in contractile organoids but with inferior properties compared to preculture with both FB/EC. These results emphasize the importance of living cells, presence of both nonmyocyte cell types as well as sequential seeding approach for cultivation of functional multicell type cardiac organoids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".