MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017817116 · doi:10.1115/1.4030309

Stability of Viscoelastic Rings Under Radial Loads With Applications to Nuclear Technology

2015· article· en· W2017817116 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Craig G. Merrett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission
KeywordsViscoelasticityMaterials scienceViscosityMechanicsDissipationStress relaxationRelaxation (psychology)InstabilityCreepComposite materialThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanics of an elastic helical coil are well known; however, the replacement of the elastic material with a viscoelastic material introduces a time dependency that requires a re-examination of the mechanics. A new theory has been developed that allows the prediction of the time to instability as a function of load, viscosity, and relaxation time, and is applied to an exemplar polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ring. The PVC ring shows that twist buckling dominates the instability, and the maximum critical time is approximately 90% of the relaxation period of the material achieved at a viscosity of 50%. Some viscosity is desirable to utilize the energy dissipation ability of a viscoelastic material. The new theory has a practical application in the field of nuclear reactor component design because the metals within the reactor are exposed to elevated temperatures thus exhibiting viscoelastic behavior. The Canadian Deuterium (CANDU®) reactor uses garter springs as spacers within the calandria of the reactor, and these spacers have been observed to move. A better understanding of the mechanics of the spacers may lead to improved spacer design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied MechanicsSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207