MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017820810 · doi:10.5339/irl.2013.3

Constitutional rights to supervised drug injection facilities in Canada

2013· article· en· W2017820810 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Bowal, Kelsey Horvat

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Law · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrugBusinessPharmacologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

أصدرت المحكمة العليا بكندا في 30 سبتمبر 2011 أمراً للحكومة الكندية بمواصلة إعفاء مراكز حقن العقاقير المخدرة الخاضعة للرقابة في مدينة فانكوفر من القوانين الجنائية الكندية الخاصة بالعقاقير. لقد استمر عمل هذه العيادة التي تضاربت حولها الآراء، والمعروفة باسم Insite ، لمدة ثماني سنوات في أكثر الأحياء التي تعاني من المشاكل الاجتماعية والتحديات الاقتصادية بسبب الإدمان على المخدرات غير المشروعة. ويعد مركز Insite من المراكز الأولى من نوعها في أمريكا الشمالية، بالرغم من استمرار عمل مراكز حقن المخدرات الخاضعة للرقابة في أوروبا وأستراليا. في هذه المقالة، نستعرض ما أقرته المحكمة بناءً على النتائج الوقائعية لهذه العيادة والأساس الدستوري الذي استند إليه الرفض القضائي لسياسة الحكومة الصحية والجنائية. كما نناقش الآثار المترتبة على هذا القرار بالنسبة إلى المراكز المماثلة في جميع أنحاء كندا

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of LawSame topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskFrench-language works237,207