Investigation of the Environment Surrounding Iron−Sulfur Cluster 4 of<i>Escherichia coli</i>Dimethylsulfoxide Reductase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iron-sulfur ([Fe-S]) clusters are common in electron transfer proteins, and their midpoint potentials (E(m) values) play a major role in defining the rate at which electrons are shuttled. The E(m) values of [Fe-S] clusters are largely dependent on the protein environment as well as solvent accessibility. The electron transfer subunit (DmsB) of Escherichia coli dimethylsulfoxide reductase contains four [4Fe-4S] clusters (FS1-FS4) with E(m) values between -50 and -330 mV. We have constructed an in silico model of DmsB and addressed the roles of a group of residues surrounding FS4 in electron transfer, menaquinol (MQH(2)) binding, and protein control of its E(m). Residues Pro80, Ser81, Cys102, and Tyr104 of DmsB are located at the DmsB-DmsC interface and are critical for the binding of the MQH(2) inhibitor analogue 2-n-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide (HOQNO) and the transfer of electrons from MQH(2) to FS4. Because the EPR spectrum of FS4 is complicated by spectral overlap and spin-spin interactions with the other [4Fe-4S] clusters of DmsB, we evaluated mutant effects on FS4 in double mutants (with a DmsB-C102S mutation) in which FS4 is assembled as a [3Fe-4S] cluster (FS4([3Fe)(-)(4S])). The DmsB-C102S/Y104D and DmsB-C102S/Y104E mutants dramatically lower the E(m) of FS4([3Fe)(-)(4S]) from 275 to 150 mV and from 275 to 145 mV, respectively. Mutations of positively charged residues around FS4([3Fe)(-)(4S]) lower its E(m), but mutations of negatively charged residues have negligible effects. The E(m) of FS4([3Fe)(-)(4S]) in the DmsB-C102S mutant is insensitive to HOQNO as well as to changes in pH from 5 to 7. The FS4([3Fe)(-)(4S]) E(m) of the DmsB-C102S/Y104D mutant increases in the presence of HOQNO and decreasing pH. Analyses of the mutants suggest that the maximum achievable E(m) for FS4([3Fe)(-)(4S]) of DmsB is approximately 275 mV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".