First Report of <i>Peach latent mosaic viroid</i> Infecting Peach in Egypt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peach latent mosaic viroid (PLMVd) is a widespread pathogen of stone fruit trees in some European and Mediterranean countries and also in North America. To access the presence of the viroid in Egypt, a survey was conducted that covered five commercial peach orchards in the El Khatatba Region in Al Minufiya Governorate. During 2003 and 2004, 73 peach trees (cv. Florida grafted on Nemagard rootstock) were visually inspected and sampled. No symptoms characteristic of PLMVd infection, such as mosaic, delayed growth, or fruit suture cracking, were observed. All samples were tested for the presence of PLMVd using dot-blot hybridization and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. Aliquots (5 μl) of total nucleic acids extracted from approximately 2 mg of leaf tissue were spotted onto positively charged nylon membranes and hybridized under stringent conditions with a digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe (2). The extracts (1 μl) also were used in RT-PCR as described (1). Only 1 of the 73 peach trees was positive for PLMVd using these detection techniques. The RT-PCR product was of the size expected for PLVMd and was cloned and sequenced. The 339 nucleotide sequence was deposited in GenBank as Accession No. DQ839564. The sequence of this Egyptian PLMVd isolate was 94% identical to the reference PLMVd variant (GenBank Accession No. M83545) and most closely (95%) related to Canadian isolate variant 16 (GenBank Accession No. AJ550911). Such a low incidence compared with other countries may be because the survey was restricted to a limited number of samples, conducted on newly reclaimed lands where no sources of infection existed before, and material with relatively low PLMVd incidence might have been used for planting. Although the incidence of PLMVd was low in this survey, the occurrence represents a threat to the stone fruit tree industry in this country and regular screening of PLMVd in certification programs is suggested. To our knowledge, this is the first report of PLMVd on peach in Egypt. References: (1) S. Loreti et al. EPPO Bull. 29:433, 1999. (2) A. M. Shamloul et al. Acta Hortic. 386:522, 1995.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".