MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017859893 · doi:10.1080/14888386.2015.1008574

Thoughts on the Arctic Biodiversity Congress 2–4 December 2014, Trondheim, Norway

2015· article· en· W2017859893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversity · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorwegianMinistry of Foreign AffairsChristian ministryAgency (philosophy)ArcticPolitical scienceCouncil of MinistersThe arcticBiodiversityPublic administrationSociologyEcologyLawBusinessOceanographySocial scienceInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgementsThe Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norwegian Ministry for Climate and Environment, Norwegian Environment Agency, Nordic Council of Ministers and Alcoa Foundation were the major sponsors. Other sponsors were the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada, Exxon Mobil, Shell and the Municipality of Trondheim. Special thanks go to the more than 450 participants who presented their findings, engaged in lively roundtable discussions and provided thoughtful remarks on ways to move forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it