The effect of postprandial changes in pH along the gastrointestinal tract on the distribution of ions between the solid and fluid phases of chyme in rainbow trout
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An area of emerging importance is the role that the diet can play in alleviating the demands for ion uptake in fish living in a freshwater environment, by providing a highly concentrated supply of electrolytes. The availability of ions for uptake from the diet likely requires dissolution in the fluid phase of the chyme. However, the distribution of ions between the fluid and solid phases of chyme has not been well-characterized in fish, and little is known about the effects of location along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, or about the pH gradients found therein, on this distribution. Hence, the pH and ionic concentrations (Na+, K+, Cl−, Ca2+ and Mg2+, in both fluid and solid phases) of the chyme in each GI tract section were measured at various time points during the digestion of a single meal of commercial pellets in freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Additionally, the presence of an inert reference marker (lead-glass beads) in the diet was used to quantify the distribution of these ions between the solid and fluid phases of the chyme. The buffering capacity of the food was evident in the acidic stomach (ST), whereas the intestine provided an alkaline environment for further digestion. It appeared that pH had little influence on the distribution of the monovalent ions between the phases in all GI tract sections. However, the ST showed significant changes in the partitioning of both Ca2+ and Mg2+, with each mineral becoming highly dissolved as the gastric chyme pH decreased. This was followed by subsequent precipitation of both minerals in the alkaline environment of the intestine. The high degree of dissolution of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the fluid phase of gastric chyme corresponded with large absorptive rates from the ST seen previously, however, this was not true of the monovalent ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".