Thermal-Hydraulic Modeling of CANDU-SCWR and Linear Dynamic Model Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CANDU-SCWR is one Generation IV reactor being developed in Canada. Significant amount of efforts has been made to develop CANDU-SCWR. Little work has been done on the dynamic analysis and control design. To observe the dynamic behaviours of CANDU-SCWR, the detailed CANDU-SCWR thermal-hydraulic model is developed. The movable boundary method is adopted for CANDU-SCWR thermal-hydraulic modeling. The benefits of adopting movable boundary are derived from the comparisons with the fixed boundary method. The steady-state results agree well with the design data. The responses of CANDU-SCWR reactor to different disturbances are simulated and analyzed and the results are reasonable in theory. Linear dynamic models are derived from simulation data of CANDU-SCWR thermal-hydraulic model around the design operating point using a system identification technique to facilitate the control system design. The linear dynamic models are validated and it is shown that they can describe the dynamic characteristics of CANDU-SCWR around the design point accurately.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".