MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017886238 · doi:10.1159/000241006

Maternal–Fetal Relationships in Corticosteroid Metabolism

2009· article· en· W2017886238 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole J. Michaud, A.F. Burton

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorticosteroneEndocrinologyInternal medicineFetusMetabolitePlacentaHormoneBiologyChemistryPregnancyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corticosterone in fetal mouse tissues after injection of mothers with 14C-corticosterone was determined by acetylation with 3H-acetic anhydride and cocrystallization to constant specific activity. The corticosterone content of whole fetal tissue varied between gestational days 13 and 17 from 641 to 300 ng/g. Specific activity of fetal hormone remained essentially constant; after a 15-min pulse this was as much as one-quarter that of maternal hormone. Placenta, head and liver showed distinctly different patterns which changed during this time, with a decrease in conversion of corticosterone to 11-dehydrocorticosterone. A sharp increase occurred in the activity of fetal liver 11beta-hydroxysteroid:NADP oxidoreductase activity. This mitochondrial enzyme, pH optimum 6, KM = 33 micrometer, reduced the metabolite, raising the relative amount of corticosterone in the fetus from 16 to 91%. 1 day after removal of maternal adrenals both maternal and fetal corticosterone were normal, indicating ability of fetal adrenals to function. Maternal corticosterone, however, crossed the placenta readily and it is considered likely that, normally, the maternal hormone predominates. Regardless of origin, corticosterone is maintained by enzymatic conversion in a distinct manner in different tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207