MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017896933 · doi:10.1353/cat.2000.0059

Les congrégations religieuses. De la France au Québec, 1880–1914 (review)

2000· article· fr· W2017896933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Choquette

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Power (physics)Political scienceLawOrder (exchange)French revolutionHoly SeePublic orderService (business)SociologyPoliticsPhilosophyEconomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a period of thirty-four years, from 1880 to 1914, a republican government was in power in France. One of its primary concerns was to ensure on the one hand that the lay and republican values proclaimed by the French Revolution [End Page 714] were securely established in French society, and on the other hand that the Catholic Church's influence be limited to the ecclesiastical and religious spheres understood in a narrow sense. This meant that the extensive influence of the French clergy, religious congregations in particular, needed to be curtailed, especially in public education. In order to achieve these objectives, beginning in 1880 the government of France legislated a series of measures that restricted the rights of religious congregations to teach in public schools, imposed three years of military service on all young men, and ultimately (1904) forbade any member of a religious congregation to teach in a French public school; then, in 1905, diplomatic relations between France and the Vatican were severed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207