Bibliographic record
Abstract
La publication de la Janua Linguarum Reserata en 1631, marque un tournant décisif dans la vie de Jan Amos Comenius (Komensky); elle représente une étape importante dans l’histoire de l’éducation et, surtout, la Janua institue la didactique des langues en discipline autonome. Contrairement à d’autres auteurs de méthodes linguistiques, Comenius concevait l’enseignement et l’apprentissage d’une langue (savante ou vulgaire), non pas comme un problème isolé, mais dans ses rapports avec la pédagogie, le philosophie et la science de son temps. C’est probablement cette vue globale des questions relatives à l’acquisition des langues qui lui permit d’en déduire un ensemble cohérent de principes simples, dont le plus connu est le parallélisme des mots et des choses. Ces principes, acceptés, corrigés ou rejetés continuent depuis des siècles à alimenter les discussions des spécialistes. Ceci constitue la preuve indéniable de l’actualité de la didactique des langues de l’auteur de la Janua , 350 ans après.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".