MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017904350 · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2616

Subtilisin-like Proprotein Convertase Expression, Localization, and Activity in the Human Retina and Optic Nerve Head

2009· article· en· W2017904350 on OpenAlexfundno aff
John A. Fuller, Anne‐Marie Brun‐Zinkernagel, Abbot F. Clark, Robert J. Wordinger

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Eye InstituteHealth Science Center, University of North TexasNational Institute on AgingUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsRetinaOptic nerveProprotein ConvertasesRetinalBiologyWestern blotMolecular biologyChemistryAnatomyBiochemistryGeneNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Subtilisin-like proprotein convertases (SPCs) are a family of calcium-dependent cleavage enzymes that act on dibasic sites of various peptide/protein substrates. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression, localization, and activity of SPCs in the human retina and optic nerve head. METHODS: mRNA expression of the SPC family in the human retina and optic nerve head tissues was evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR). Double immunofluorescence staining was performed on paraffin-embedded human posterior sections to localize SPC family members. Western blot analysis was used to identify PACE4 isoform expression within the optic nerve head and retina. In addition, a fluorogenic SPC substrate-based assay was used to elucidate SPC enzyme activity within human retina and optic nerve head (ONH) tissues. RESULTS: QPCR results indicated that PC1 and PC2 were expressed 4.1- and 5.7-fold higher in retina compared to optic nerve head, whereas PACE4 was expressed 4.1-fold higher in the ONH. PC1 and PC2 were localized primarily in neuronal cells, whereas PACE4 and PC5 were limited to the glia of the retina and optic nerve head. SPC activity in ONH lysate was significantly higher than that of retinal lysate; however, when an SPC inhibitor was added, activity in ONH decreased more than that in retina. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the SPCs are expressed in distinct patterns throughout the human retina and ONH. PC1 and PC2 were primarily expressed in neurons, whereas PACE4 appeared to be largely restricted to glia. Thus, elevated PACE4 may modulate the bioactivity of proteins secreted in the ONH and retina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207