MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017932087 · doi:10.1139/v08-153

Copper-catalyzed one-pot synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives

2008· article· en· W2017932087 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hashem Sharghi, Mona Hosseini‐Sarvari, Fatemeh Moeini

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Synthesis and Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenzimidazoleChemistryCatalysisReusabilityLeaching (pedology)PyridineArylHeterogeneous catalysisCombinatorial chemistryCopperOne-pot synthesisOrganic chemistryMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple, efficient, and environmentally benign method has been developed for the synthesis of 2-substituted benzimidazoles through a one-pot reaction of phenylenediamines with aryl aldehydes in excellent isolated yields under mild conditions using Cu(II) complex as the selective, recyclable, and heterogeneous catalyst at ambient temperature. The Cu(II) complex as a heterogeneous catalyst can be reused in further catalytic reactions, and it was found that its activity remained largely unchanged for eight successive runs. No metal-complex leaching was observed after the consecutive catalytic reactions. The salient features of this method include mild conditions, high yields, simple procedure, and good recovery and reusability of the heterogeneous catalyst.Key words: benzimidazole, o-phenylenediamine, arylaldehydes, heterogeneous catalyst, N,N-bis (2-hydroxyphenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and ReactionsFrench-language works237,207