MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017933974 · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00101.1

A Model for Nighttime Minimum Temperatures

2014· article· en· W2017933974 on OpenAlexaff
Debbie J. Dupuis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Climate · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive modelClimatologyEnvironmental scienceResidualDaytimeClimate changeSeries (stratigraphy)HeteroscedasticityPopulationMathematicsStatisticsEconometricsAtmospheric sciencesGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The southwestern United States has experienced some of the most important increases in nighttime minimum temperatures over the last 60 yr, and climate models are projecting more of the same to the end of the century. As climate, geography, and population density vary considerably over the area, very diverse extreme temperature levels and dynamics are observed. It is shown how nighttime minimum temperatures over the 1950–2009 period exhibit more complex dynamics than daytime maximum temperatures. The author studies nighttime minimum temperature series from 12 locations and presents one model capable of capturing all the features of the data at each location. The time series preprocessing model normalizes seasonal shocks by daily and yearly volatility components before modeling the residual volatility as an exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity [EGARCH(1, 1)] process with seasonal autoregressive structure to account for the presence of nonlinear and seasonal linear dependence, respectively, in the residual series. An exceedance over high thresholds approach is then used to model the tail of the distribution of scaled residuals from the preprocessing model. The resulting marginal distribution of nighttime minimum temperature at each location is then examined to see how it has changed in mean, scale, and shape, respectively, over the 60-yr period. Changes at the 12 locations vary considerably: many locations have seen considerable change in some or all of the three parameters, while two locations have experienced little or no change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ClimateSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207