MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017940217 · doi:10.1115/ajtec2011-44606

Experimental Investigation of Two-Phase Flow in a Multi-Branch Reduced T-Junction With Co-Current Stratified Gas-Liquid Flow

2011· article· en· W2017940217 on OpenAlexaff
Robert C. Bowden, Ibrahim Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFroude numberStratified flowEntrainment (biomusicology)InletMechanicsStratified flowsFlow (mathematics)Two-phase flowVolumetric flow rateMaterials scienceFlow visualizationCurrent (fluid)Stratification (seeds)ThermodynamicsGeologyPhysicsTurbulenceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were performed in a horizontal reduced T-junction using a branch diameter of 6.35 mm and an inlet pipe diameter of 50.8 mm. The inlet length was 1.8 m, and three branch orientations were tested at 0, 45, and 90 degrees from horizontal. Air and water, operating at 206 kPa, were used to provide a two-phase environment. Both fluids flowed co-currently within the inlet towards the branch in the smooth-stratified regime. Flow visualization was used to identify the onset of gas entrainment. The critical height at the onset of gas entrainment was quantified as a function of the single phase liquid branch Froude number for the 45, and 90 degree branches, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint ConferenceSame topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207