MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017946959 · doi:10.12745/et.15.1.898

'In the sight of all': Queen Elizabeth and the Dance of Diplomacy

2012· article· en· W2017946959 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bella Mirabella

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Theatre · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceBalletQueen (butterfly)Modern danceArtPoliticsScholarshipContemporary danceVisual artsSubject (documents)Period (music)Focus (optics)DiplomacyAestheticsSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using dance and performance as part of her political apparatus, Queen Elizabeth consciously staged and manipulated the occasions of her own dancing to help construct her image as monarch and then generated a reputation of herself as a great dancer around those occasions. The issue of dance and politics in the Early Modern Period has been the subject of a number of studies, but much of that scholarship focuses on court spectacles such as the ballet de cour and the masque in the seventeenth-century. In this essay I want to shift the focus to Elizabeth and her dancing in broader terms beyond the confines of the masque. In analyzing the queen’s particular strategies, I will focus on the necessity of display in dance as well as on the convergence of the rhetorics of dancing and language

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.019
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly TheatreSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207