MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Response of Residuals to External Deviations in a Controlled Production Process

2000· article· en· W2017990064 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiangbin Yang, Viliam Make

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnometrics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResidualProcess (computing)Control chartAutocorrelationProcess controlComputer scienceChartControl theory (sociology)Property (philosophy)Autoregressive integrated moving averageStatistical process controlMathematicsControl (management)StatisticsAlgorithmTime seriesArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a general method for studying residual behavior of controlled autocorrelated processes subject to special-cause changes. Understanding residual response to a particular type of process change is important for selecting a proper control chart to monitor the process effectively. The method is introduced by analyzing the residual behavior of a controlled machining process described by a state-space model that has a simple structure and is representative of many real processes. The general method is then developed and applied to an ARIMA(p, l, q) process and to some special processes whose residual behavior has been investigated in the literature. Residual response to a general disturbance sequence is determined, and it is shown that the residual properties are independent of the type of feedback control applied to the process. Implications of this property for process control and monitoring are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnometricsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Process MonitoringFrench-language works237,207